New YouTube Channel
    Flu Vaccine Hoax
    Why Kids Don’t Ride Their Bikes Any More
    New vaccine book: The War On Children



Really have been focusing on building up the video library. Had no idea some of them would be so popular.

Check these out when you get a moment:



With any good advertising program, timing is everything. So now we get the mandatory Winter Flu Shot Hustle. With stories appearing simultaneously on Fox and CNN, you can see how the #1 advertiser in the world – the pharmaceutical industry – coordinates its message, spooking everybody with their latest Boutique Epidemic.

The drug industry is the master at keeping the message simple and folksy. This is why these banner articles in global media about deadly flu “epidemics” are written by unlettered, uncredentialled junior staff writers, never by scientists. Don’t want it to get too technical or complicated. Just a simple message, in the lowest common denominator of Common Core dialect, and keep repeating the fundamentals.

Fox was the slickest – its article of 27 Jan: Flu deaths prompt warnings from victims’ families as outbreak continues

follows a classic online marketing template: testimonials with photos. Only difference is, here we have happy, normal people who recently died from the flu – allegedly. Big color photos, with the family angle. Short, chatty articles, boo-hoo, a lot of inference, not so much fact.

Maybe the people are real, maybe they’re not. One story right after another, making sure to get all demographics of age and race – all based on fear and heartstrings – an attempt at shock and persuasion.

All are variations on the same story – had a happy normal life, when all of a sudden flu ‘came along’ and in one week, boom! Dead as disco, etc.

Another fluff piece from CNN , 26 Jan:

    ‘Many more weeks’ to come in fierce, deadly flu season, CDC says

was a little cheesier, but with precisely the same message: get your flu shot now or die:

    “This year’s seemingly unyielding flu season continues to ravage the entire continental United States, as health authorities track additional deaths and hospitalization … ”

an avalanche of adjectives, simulating a bad college freshman English essay assignment.

Written by a CDC blogger (‘spokeswoman’), the author makes free to predict the future: ” the worst is yet to come” – a fundamental of Marketing 101 when promoting future sales ….

This paragraph sets the tone:

    “There were 11,965 laboratory-confirmed flu-related hospitalizations reported from October 1 to January 20. The number of people infected with influenza could be much higher because not everyone goes to their doctor when they are sick nor do doctors test every patient.”

She’s quoting CDC charts for the entire USA, which would mean about 3000 cases per month in a population of 320 million. Which is not really that significant, because

    1. of the immunosuppressive diet and lifestyle of 80% of the population

    2. statistically, 90% of these hospital cases already got the flu shot

    3. ”flu-related hospitalizations” could simply mean they didn’t necessarily go to the hospital because they had the flu, but simply got the flu while in the hospital.

Nosocomial infections now account for 99,000 deaths per year in the US. Preventing Healthcare – Associated Infections – CDC

A large number of these deaths ultimately involve influenza in the last stage of immune suppression.

We can presume that everyone got a flu shot in the hospital, unless they already had one. Some may even get a second one “just to be sure.”

But all this media is laboring under a false premise: that flu shots will prevent the flu. They can’t.

By their own statistics, flu shots don’t work because here are all these people in the hospital with the flu, statistically at least 90% of whom have been vaccinated.

This brings up the preposterous notion of curative vaccines.

Vaccines can’t cure anything somebody’s already got. Some patients with the flu go in for doctor or hospital visits, and if they haven’t already had the flu shot, are immediately given one. Why? This is medieval superstition, persisting from the time of Edward Jenner, chief conjurer of the vaccine mythology.

Even Jenner himself never claimed that any vaccine could cure an existing disease in a patient. The absolute most that any vaccine scientist has ever claimed is that vaccines will create antibodies to fight against some future infection by a specific disease pathogen, etc..

Which dogma is itself impossible since the vaccines contain manmade mutations of the original virus. With the influenza vaccines then, there’s this additional random guess of which 3 strains out of the 1000 possible influenza strains are we going to put in this year’s flu shot.

But the point is, vaccine scientists have never claimed that vaccines can cure a disease a patient already has. Only today’s nurses and pediatricians assert something that completely fanciful.
Actually, that might be a screening test you can use.

The real reason that flu shots cannot prevent the flu requires a little discussion and a little research.

According to CDC, at this time in the US there exist over 1000 strains of influenza virus.

With a little more probing, you will learn that the vast majority of them are harmless. If we did cultures of the skin and tract of 1000 random people, we would find some influenza virus in the vast majority of them, that would not cause any symptoms or disease whatsoever. Just part of the normal biosphere in which all mammals have evolved during the past 250 million years.

This is the main reason that it was so difficult to get the flu vaccine approved in the first place. They tried and tried, and failed for over 20 years because everyone knew that influenza was mainly a harmless, ubiquitous virus that had been around forever.

But finally in 2006, politics and lobbying won out over science and suddenly we had the flu shot added to the mandated schedule. But not just 3 or four doses, like with most vaccines that are added. No, this was the vaccine triumph of all time for the Merck company : a yearly shot for 18 years for all children. Forever!


For those of you who can remember before 2006, did you used to get the flu every year? And did the flu shot ever improve your health?

Many practitioners have noticed that most of their patients who get the flu every year are the same ones who get flu shots.

Now that’s marketing.

The real Golden Fleece trick with influenza was that as people’s toxic lifestyle caused them to become more and more immune-suppressed – no gut flora, no peristalsis, clogged arteries — these sluggish areas became Petri dishes for the proliferation of virtually any opportunistic microbes. Since influenza viruses are some of the most prevalent in the human biosphere, it was only natural that they were the ones that so often gained a foothold. And then people say “I got the flu.”

But the bugs didn’t cause the disease. It was the toxic environment created by the individual’s lifestyle.

Even Louis Pasteur, inventor of the Germ Theory, finally admitted that one on his deathbed: “Le germe n’est rien, c’est le terrain qui est tout.”

Like the Holiday Season, the Flu Season was created by merchants. Want to keep from getting the flu? Stop eating donuts, fries, ice cream, pasteurized dairy, hydrogenated snacks, drinking coffee, taking drugs, etc. — stop depressing your immune system.

Let’s do this: Give me 200 patients who often get the flu in the winter. Half of them can get the flu shot. The other half will not, but I will have control over their lifestyle for 3 months. Then bring in your Vegas oddsmakers, and we’ll see who gets the flu and who doesn’t.

Any takers?

“So often times it happens /that we live our lives in chains
And we never even know we have the key “ – Glenn Frey



Little girls used to play with dolls. Little boys would run around outside, and climb trees. Kids used to go to the park and play on the climbing bars and ride their bicycles. Even sports, they used to play sports without being pushed into it. Musical kids used to take band class and learn an instrument. Literate kids would read books. Kids used to play with toys in their toybox. And in the sandbox.

All that is vanishing. These days, leave most kids alone for 5 minutes and you know what the default will be – they’ll be locked in the virtual world of DS, Mario Bros, Nintendo Switch, silly laptop kids sites, etc.

This is not happening to just a few kids here and there, but has become the new normal. Starts by age 5 – if you’re lucky. As many hours a day as you’ll let them, they’re in that electronic escape zone.

They’re building a reality inside their neurology that they cannot share with you. Nor do they want to. But more precisely they’re molding their own brain neurology – upon the literary, intellectual, and imaginative limitations of thought and expression possessed by creators of kid media.

These are life patterns – neuroplasticity. Even more than school, more than parental contact,here’s where the new child’s personality is being infused with its first ethics, morals, social values, vocabulary, sense of humor, initial opinions on issues of politics and academics … it all starts right here.

The insidious nature of this social transformation is not without its benefits. The pedagogues who have located the pulse of lowest common denominator child intelligence, reinforcing it all day every day, stifling imagination and new ideas, these people are making enormous fortunes. They can afford to strengthen their position – their brand – making it a permanent part of the prosaic American landscape. And an indelible influence on a child’s first expectations of his own limits, because now he thinks – oh this is what most kids are supposed to be like, what they think is cool…

The benefits for parents are also considerable – the child doesn’t need to be watched or entertained or disciplined. He’s effectively neutralized. While the obedient little zombies dissociate from actual home life, the exhausted parents are allowed to catch their breath, get some of the rest they desperately need in the race of everyday life.

That little voice inside the parents that’s going “All this electronic input can’t be that good for them… ” they might hear it at first, when they first begin to see that the child doesn’t even notice when they come home from work, or when the parent try to have some desultory communication.

But eventually we follow the path of least resistance – nothing can compete with the power and magnitude of online kids games. Awash in this floodtide, any feeble attempts at normal conversation – “How was school today… what did you learn…?” etc. become fainter and fainter, very quickly. Nothing quite compares to the urgency of the Mario Brothers’ latest simian adventures, or the endless selection of videos of very ordinary people who record whatever banality comes into their empty minds and post it on YouTube for kids.

Talk to grade school staff people. Ask them what percentage of 5th graders have their own iPhones. Ask them what differences they’ve noticed in the past 3 years in the number of kids signing up for music, sports, and other activities. Or what other major shifts there have been in school behavior in recent years that can be linked to electronics games.

Certainly there are benefits for the child as well. From the very beginning of life, an awareness of typed-in commands, graphic interface, being online or not, keyboard facility, passwords, chargers, rebooting, loading, downloading, etc. become inserted into the child’s developmental DNA. The tabula rasa neurology of the child learns exponentially faster than the adult brain– they only have to be shown something once and it’s locked in. Something that interests them, that is.

So all these cybernetic experiences of the first few years of life introduce the child into today’s infinite online universe. More and more coursework is online today – not just college and high school, but grade school as well. Jacked-in kids will doubtless have a real advantage with any schoolwork that has to be done on computer. Or any other area of research they are interested in, although that will become a disadvantage if they learn to worship at the altar of wiki/google, like most people do.

Admittedly, the advantage of exposure to worthwhile knowledge and training is present as well, and possible for the child. The difficulty is finding it, sifting the wheat from the chaff, as the majority of online information and “science” is skewed – professionally molded by the vested interests who have always controlled information media, since the time of Gutenberg. [The Doors of Perception]

There’s no closing the lid on Pandora’s box, of course. We’ve looked inside. For better and for worse, the human race will never return to a world without the internet.

The tragedy is that no one takes the time to show children that the internet is a microcosm of human behavior. It’s all there: classic literature, world history – accurate and imaginary, instruction in the arts, training in any skill you can think of, classic fairytales, legitimate academic research, academic fluff, science – both good and bad, romance and dating, corporate-controlled ‘news,’ depraved websites, political views from the sublime to the ridiculous, the science of lying in all its evolved forms, and much more.

In most cases, once they’re online, kids are on their own. Thrown into the jungle without a map. Nobody gives them an introduction to the good and bad of it all. They wouldn’t pay attention for more than 2 minutes anyway. Because in most of kids’ media, creators have decided that the dumber the content the more kids they will pay attention.

So they market to the lowest common denominator of intelligence – no image longer than 3 seconds, no sophisticated comedy requiring 2 steps of deductive logic, no references to science or history or anything requiring education. This is entertainment for the masses of undereducated kids – big on bathroom jokes, Star Wars cartoons, girls hitting boys in the face, talking animals, preferably borderline retarded, a lot of pictures of candy, the most banal conversations possible, etc.

Gone is the artistic and script sophistication of Pixar (Ratatouille, Cars, Nemo, etc) from a decade ago, or classic Disney (Fantasia, Cinderella, etc. ) from many decades ago. Most kids today cannot follow a story line that complex. It’s possible they could be trained, but there’s no longer enough of a catalogue of films at this level to maintain their appreciation.

Want an education? Make a list of what your child is watching online. Don’t suggest anything – they don’t want your opinion anyway. Just write down the sites they choose. Once you have the list, do some research – spend some time viewing it. And then gradually, the future will reveal itself. These are its inhabitants – these are their values.

Think it’s going to improve as they get older? Do the same thing with your 19 year old.

See why those bike tires are all flat now?



Controlled opposition. Know what that is, right? Might be time to re-read The Doors of Perception and remind yourself that the power of Edward L Bernays is still with us, growing stronger all the time.

Corporate media isn’t taking any chances in this day when blogs can become as popular as syndicated news outlets. When all we had was printed media, it was much easier to guarantee a homogeneous slant in all big city newspapers on any assigned news subject.

Those days are gone in today’s online Wild West, where education, authority, accountability, intelligence, literacy, accurate research – none of these mean a thing. Anybody can say anything online. All that counts is popularity.

So. The bottomless pockets can launch their own programs to defuse legitimate opposition. They have untold funds to create sites that look like actual people opposing entrenched corporate doctrines. But the postings on these sites are often so extreme, so tin hat, so illiterate, so ill-researched so easily discredited … that most people don’t give them a second thought. Problem is, then by association, people will discredit that entire point of view, never taking the time to search for documented sources.

That’s Controlled Opposition. Fake opposition – the writers pretend to really disagree with the mainstream view, but they’re so weak and insipid that their side of the argument can’t possibly be tenable. It’s deliberate – these sites are often invented and paid for by the very entities they pretend to be attacking.

It’s a beautiful thing. Flood the issue with confusion – it takes so much time to figure out what’s true that most people give up after a few minutes.

Perfect example this month. George Severino, director of the HHS Office for Civil Rights, came out with this announcement:

    “ Law protecting religious freedom and conscience rights are just empty words on paper if they aren’t enforced. No one should be forced to choose between helping sick people and living by one’s deepest moral or religious convictions, and the new division will help guarantee that victims of unlawful discrimination find justice. For too long, governments big and small have treated conscience claims with hostility instead of protection, but change is coming and it begins here and now…”

Stirring sentiments, to be sure. Who could argue with convictions that red, white, and blue? But the bottomless pockets of vaccine industry misdirection saw a golden opportunity here to discredit the so-called anti-vaxxer camp. Time for a little Controlled Opposition.

So now we have this sudden rash of pseudo anti-vax websites pretending to oppose the draconian vaccine laws that now hold the country in thrall, laws ending state exemption regs that have been around for decades. And they’re hailing Severino’s announcement like it’s the Gettysburg Address or The Sermon on the Mount.

And they start making claims that this quote signals the return of medical freedom– the re-instating of all the vaccine exemption laws that have been abolished in recent years. Of course none of that is happening at all.

Just a little reading and you’ll notice these sites don’t seem real, nor do the third-rate firebrands writing the lead stories.

Here’s a prime example:

    Trump Lays Groundwork To Ban Mandatory Vaccinations Across U.S.

They start by quoting the above paragraph from Severino, and then begin making the most extravagant conclusions from it:

    “With the establishment of the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division division on Thursday, Trump has laid the groundwork to dismantle each and every vaccine mandate across the country. Big Pharma’s chokehold on the nation’s health has been released.”

Talk about drawing unwarranted conclusions. (the repeat of “division” was not really a typo. That’s their level of composition.)

What they’re referring to of course is Trump’s discussion with Bobby Kennedy, a year ago, {See Jan 2017 Newsletter }

to establish a Commission that might take an objective look at the science behind vaccines. It was just a discussion, always vague, no details, with no follow up whatsoever for 2 years. Not a word. This is the follow up! Or so these Controlled Oppositionists are inferring.

The chokehold has been released?? In what universe?

They plod on:

    “The Conscience and Religious Freedom Division gives many different groups a big tent under which to fight for our constitutional rights. Christians and libertarians, as well as freethinkers and people of other religious faiths, have a common interest in fighting against Big Pharma’s corrupt health establishment…”

How can anybody say what it does or doesn’t do? It doesn’t give anyone anything — it doesn’t even exist yet! And if it’s really going to be an open forum, imagine the opportunity for the vaccine industry to invent some really classy Controlled Opposition, with which they could flood such a commission.

Perhaps the most hallucinatory nonsequitur in the article is this heading

    “President Trump has created a new division within the Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights, with the express purpose of banning mandatory vaccinations across the country, and ensuring citizens have a right to choose their own healthcare.”

We leave the real world at the comma. Express purpose of banning mandatory vaccinations…? Who said anything about that, ever? Where does it say that, anywhere? Is the some rehab hotline?

They wrap up with a final exhaled smoke cloud:

“President Trump has given us a tool to use against tyranny.”

Believe me, as author of 15 editions of Vaccination Is Not Immunization, no one wishes that were true more than I. We can certainly use any and all such tools that we can get. But this isn’t one of them. No one knows what it is, or even if it will last more than a week.

This same article then predictably refers to another blog, its virtual clone: actually quoting its ridiculous article as a source:

in which they make this insupportable statement

    “Trump has laid the groundwork to smash every single vaccine mandate as well as turn BIG PHARMA into little pharma.”

Really? When did he do that? When did he say anything even remotely like that?

Seems unlikely, especially when a few days later the White House physician posted a 30 minute YouTube report on Trump’s health, that listed 2 vaccines Donald recently got, and a third flu shot likely.

Does that really sound like someone leading a crusade to end vaccine tyranny?

This is just an introduction into this week’s rash of Neanderthal antivax sites that lauded this non-event to the skies, most of them clutching at straws like a drowning man. There are many more, each one equally unworthy of quoting from. Would that it were all true, and more. But this dog just don’t hunt.

‘Unrealistic’ wouldn’t be my first choice of descriptors here – they’re pretending that the trillion-dollar global drug industry is suddenly going to be reduced to a reasonably scientific level, just because some lower-rung bureaucrat announced a new division in some peripheral new government office.

Get a grip, fellas. Even if such a Commission would actually be set up and begin reviewing the science behind the last 50 years of vaccine mandates, calling them to account before a board of world class immunologists wholly unconnected to the global vaccine monolith ….

Even if that Disney sequence were to take place, what effect would all that have on policymakers at CDC who actually set the Recommended Immunization Schedule for American children? All the known and unknown levels of bureaucracy that intervene between these two offices — David and Goliath – the ant and the elephant – pick your metaphor.

For years Wakefield, Blaylock, myself and others have been stacking up the best scientific references – thousands of them – from floor to ceiling – the best science that proves beyond any doubt how vaccines are harmful to children, and do not necessarily promote immunity. So how could any Commission possibly do any better, by stacking up thousands more?

Even if the Commission existed.

What good will reviewing more science do? It’s no longer about science. Ordinary people don’t read science. They can’t. The only read headlines and headings and soundbytes and tweets no longer that 140 characters.

Vaccine policy is not based on science. It’s based on a neverending media that distract attention from the actual science, and focus instead on the new vaccine laws. Anyone who disagree with the new edicts is made to look as brainless or as disingenuous as the posers behind these Controlled Opposition sites in this fake news story.

That’s the world we live in today.



Vaccination Is Not Immunization: The War On Children

This version is a complete re-write. If you have read any of the previous editions, this isn’t it.

The book covers so much that has happened since the last edition, vital intel that is being kept out of everyday media:

    the global agenda to force vaccines and remove exemptions
    the breakthrough film Vaxxed
    why California is the most dangerous state for infants
    world statistics on infant survival
    the end of the science debate, with the new policy of Legislate Don’t Educate
    the persecution of MDs who sign exemptions
    what the future holds for US children
    peer reviewed literature proving the autism connection
    how many children really die from vaccines
    much more

Certainly the new parent’s most reliable introduction to the subject.

An excerpt :

    “Who could have predicted that the next war would be the War on Children? With vaccine injuries increasing over 3000% in the past 20 years, and again for the next 20, and with CDC’s steadfast refusal to study the autism epidemic, it’s terrifying that the worst of it all is likely decades away. The gradual degradation of the human genome, a proven consequence of vaccines, will be evident in the lives of today’s children, but much more so in the lives of their children. And on and on.

    “The radical cultural shift occurring today is not primarily about vaccines, but about ownership. Who owns the land, the soil, the atmosphere, the water, the DNA of plants, and of animals, the DNA of humans, and now finally, who owns the people and their children. Policymakers along the Potomac have made it clear that the State knows better than parents how children should be raised, how they should think, and what manmade chemicals should be mandated into their bloodstreams. The trick is to get everyone to comply.

    “The vaccine issue is just the first skirmish. If the majority of people will support the State’s takeover of personal vaccine choices that parents should be making for their children, where will they draw the line?

    “The execution of this new agenda is a Machiavellian triumph. Slogans, clichés, and soundbytes now replace thoughtful reflection about life and death issues. Wiki and google are the new technocracy for fashioning reality itself in a mind no longer capable of independent judgment.

    “Virtual life replaces real life.

    “The rest is easy. With an electorate of this calibre, any assigned opinion can be installed onto the public hard drive. [258]

    “Human health does not come from a drug or a vaccine or an insurance company. A healthy baby needs no outside assistance, no tampering with the blood. The mysteries of health lie within the body, not within the medical texts, or the writs of law.

    “Pure, uncontaminated human blood is indeed a sacred commodity. We will arrive at a position of profound gratitude when we finally come to appreciate the identity, the oneness, the nobility of an inviolate bloodstream.”

Shouldn’t the most important decision in your child’s life should be an informed decision?

To order new book: 915.307.1055 or 408.753.9830 –